Skip to Content

Judicial Trends in Public Health

Source & Scope of Public Health Legal Powers

The Network’s monthly reporter, Judicial Trends in Public Health (JTPH), highlights key court cases and relevant judicial trends in public health. The cases below are organized under the JTPH topic, “Source & Scope of Public Health Legal Powers.”

View Cases Learn More

Cases

Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. Azar

District of Columbia, et al. v. U.S. Department of Agriculture, et al.

CA Smoke & Vape Association, Inc v. County of Los Angeles

Sierra Club v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

In re National Prescription Opiate Litigation

In re S.P.

Raysor, et al. v. DeSantis

Jenny L. Flores v. William P. Barr

Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania

Department of Homeland Security v. New York

California v. Texas & U.S. House of Representatives v. Texas

Juliana v. United States

State of New York, et al. v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Nicopure Labs v. U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA)

RPF Oil Company v. Genesee County

New York v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

City & County of San Francisco v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services

State of California v. The Little Sisters of the Poor

Clean Water Action et al. v. EPA et al

Explore more sub-topics related to Judicial Trends in Public Health

Constitutional Rights & the Public’s Health

Preventing & Treating Communicable Conditions

Social Distancing Measures

Addressing Chronic Conditions

Mitigating the Incidence & Severity of Injuries & Other Harms

Public Health Information Management, Privacy & Security

Regulating Communications

Monitoring Property & the Built Environment

Public Health Emergency: Legal Preparedness & Response