Skip to Content

Judicial Trends in Public Health

Source and Scope of Public Health Legal Powers

The Network’s monthly reporter, Judicial Trends in Public Health (JTPH), highlights key court cases and relevant judicial trends in public health. The cases below are organized under the JTPH topic, “Source & Scope of Public Health Legal Powers.”

View Cases Learn More

Cases

Judicial Trends

Mo Cann Do Inc. v. Missouri Dept. of Health and Human Services

Texas v. U.S.

Gripum, LLC v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration

Texas v. Becerra

American Hospital Association, et al. v. Becerra

West Virginia, et al. v. EPA, et al.

Arizona v. Yellen

In re: Greg Abbott et al.

Health Freedom Defense Fund, Inc., et al. v. Biden, et al.

Bentonville School District v. Sitton

State of Louisiana v. Biden

Western Growers Association v. Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board

Arizona School Boards Association, Inc. v. Arizona

Mississippi v. Tennessee, et al.

Adventist Health Systems/SunBelt, Inc., et al. v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, et al.

Biden v. Missouri and Becerra v. Louisiana

National Federation of Independent Business v. Department of Labor and Ohio v. Department of Labor

Texas Health Huguley, Inc. v. Jones

Apartment Assoc. of Metropolitan Pittsburgh, Inc., v. The City of Pittsburgh

Arizona School Boards Association Inc. v. Arizona

Doyle v. Tidball

Alabama Association of Realtors, et al. v. Department of Health and Human Services, et al.

Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. United States

The Judge Rotenberg Educational Center, Inc. v. U.S. Food & Drug Administration

State of Florida v. Becerra, et al.

California v. Texas

Alabama Association of Realtors, et al. v. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, et al.

City and County of San Francisco v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

Skyworks, Ltd. et al. v. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention et al.

Terkel, et al. v. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), et al.

Association of Community Cancer Centers, et al. v. Azar II, et al.

Hayes v. Oregon

American Hospital Association, et al. v. Azar

Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health Services, Inc. et al. v. Kauffman et al.

P.J.E.S. v. Wolf, et al.

Exby-Stolley v. Board of County Commissioners

Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. Azar

District of Columbia, et al. v. U.S. Department of Agriculture, et al.

CA Smoke & Vape Association, Inc v. County of Los Angeles

Sierra Club v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

In re National Prescription Opiate Litigation

In re S.P.

Raysor, et al. v. DeSantis

Jenny L. Flores v. William P. Barr

Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania

Department of Homeland Security v. New York

California v. Texas & U.S. House of Representatives v. Texas

Juliana v. United States

State of New York, et al. v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Nicopure Labs v. U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA)

RPF Oil Company v. Genesee County

New York v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

City & County of San Francisco v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services

State of California v. The Little Sisters of the Poor

Clean Water Action et al. v. EPA et al

Explore more sub-topics related to Judicial Trends in Public Health

Reproductive Liberties and Care Access

Constitutional Rights and the Public’s Health

Preventing and Treating Communicable Conditions

Social Distancing Measures

Addressing Chronic Conditions

Mitigating the Incidence and Severity of Injuries and Other Harms

Public Health Information Management, Privacy and Security

Regulating Communications

Monitoring Property and the Built Environment

Public Health Emergency: Legal Preparedness and Response

COVID-19 Pandemic: Public Health Emergency Law & Policy Responses