Skip to Content

Judicial Trends in Public Health

Constitutional Rights & the Public’s Health

The Network’s monthly reporter, Judicial Trends in Public Health (JTPH), highlights key court cases and relevant judicial trends in public health. The cases below are organized under the JTPH topic, “Constitutional Rights and the Public’s Health.”

View Cases Learn More

Cases

Dylan Brandt et al. v. Leslie Rutledge et al.

SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Justice Collective, et al. v. Governor of the State of Georgia, et al.

Anthony Petro, et al. v. Matthew J. Platkin

Planned Parenthood of the Heartland, Inc. v. Iowa

Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization

N.Y. State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen

Bongo Productions, LLC, et al. v. Lawrence, et al.

Plata v. Newsom

Pisano v. Mayo Clinic Florida

Whole Woman’s Health v. Jackson

Burcham v. City of Los Angeles

Velicky v. The Copycat Building, LLC, and Walke v. The Copycat Building, LLC (consolidated)

Whole Woman’s Health v. Jackson

Fraihat v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

Committee for Public Counsel Services, et al. v. Barnstable County Sheriff’s Office, et al.

Streight v. Pritzker

Memphis Center for Reproductive Health, et al. v. Slatery, et al.

United States v. Texas

Grimm v. Gloucester County School Board

Norwegian Cruise Lines Holdings, LTD, et al. v. Scott Rivkees, MD

Whole Woman’s Health v. Jackson

Bryant v. Woodall

Planned Parenthood of the Heartland, Inc. v. Reynolds

Reproductive Health Services of Planned Parenthood of St. Louis Region, Inc. v. Parson

Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee

Slattery, et al. v. Cuomo

Preterm-Cleveland, et al. v. McCloud (Ohio Department of Health)

B.W.C. v. Williams

Jones v. Mississippi

In re DD

Torres v. Madrid et al.

Tandon v. Newsom

In re: Da Graca et al.

Next Level Arcade Tucson, LLC v. Pima County

Machovec, et al. v. Palm Beach County

EMW Women’s Surgical Center, et al. v. Friedlander, et. al.

Republican National Committee v. Common Cause Rhode Island

Texas League of United Latin American Citizens, et al. v. Hughs

Texas Democratic Party v. Abbott

County of Butler v. Wolf

Proctor v. Krzanowski

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists v. Hahn

Skyline Wesleyan Church v. Cal. Dep’t of Managed Health Care

Dale Hartkemeyer v. William P. Barr et al.

Agency for International Development et al. v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc., et al.

Don’t Shoot Portland v. City of Portland

Slidewaters LLC v. Washington Department of Labor and Governor Jay Inslee

June Medical Services v. Russo

Department of Homeland Security, et al. v. Regents of the University of California, et al

Laddy Curtis Valentine v. Bryan Collier

Gary B. v. Whitmer

Fraihat v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

Guns Save Life, Inc. v. Ali

Maine Community Health Options v. U.S.

Thakker v. Doll

Kliger v. Healey

White v. Cuomo

Parents for Privacy v. Barr

City of Flint v. Guertin

Roe v. Department of Defense

Horvath v. City of Leander

EMW Women’s Surgical Center, P.S.C. v. Meier

City of Boise v. Martin

State of Texas, et. al. v. U.S.

Christopher G. Yanakos, et. al. v. UPMC, et. al.

Tulsa Women’s Reproductive Clinic v. Hunter et al.

Ms. J.P. et al. v. William P Barr

Little Rock Family Planning Services. v. Rutledge

Explore more sub-topics related to Judicial Trends in Public Health

Source & Scope of Public Health Legal Powers

Preventing & Treating Communicable Conditions

Social Distancing Measures

Addressing Chronic Conditions

Mitigating the Incidence & Severity of Injuries & Other Harms

Public Health Information Management, Privacy & Security

Regulating Communications

Monitoring Property & the Built Environment

Public Health Emergency: Legal Preparedness & Response

COVID-19 Pandemic: Public Health Emergency Law & Policy Responses