COVID-19 Pandemic: Public Health Emergency Law & Policy Responses
The Network’s monthly reporter, Judicial Trends in Public Health (JTPH), highlights key court cases and relevant judicial trends in public health. The cases below are organized under the JTPH topic, “COVID-19 Pandemic: Public Health Emergency Law & Policy Responses.”

Cases

Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd. et al. v. State Surgeon General, Florida Department of Health
Read More

Shoemaker v. UMPC Pinnacle Hospitals
Read More

Ritter et al. v. Oklahoma
Read More

Flower World v. Sacks
Read More

The Gym 24/7 Fitness, LLC v. Michigan
Read More

Grisham v. Hudson
Read More

Church v. Polis
Read More

Armstrong v. Newsom
Read More

Heidel v. Hochul
Read More

Ho v. Tulsa Spine & Specialty Hospital, L.L.C.
Read More
Explore more sub-topics related to Judicial Trends in Public Health

Reproductive Liberties & Care Access
Learn More

Source & Scope of Public Health Legal Powers
Learn More

Constitutional Rights & the Public’s Health
Learn More

Preventing & Treating Communicable Conditions
Learn More

Social Distancing Measures
Learn More

Addressing Chronic Conditions
Learn More

Mitigating the Incidence & Severity of Injuries & Other Harms
Learn More

Public Health Information Management, Privacy & Security
Learn More

Regulating Communications
Learn More

Monitoring Property & the Built Environment
Learn More

Public Health Emergency: Legal Preparedness & Response
Learn More