Kathleen Hoke, J.D., serves as Senior Advisor to the Network. Kathleen was previously Director of the Network’s Eastern Region, a position she held since the Network launched in 2010. She is also a law school professor and director of the Legal Resource Center for Public Health Policy at the University of Maryland Carey School of Law.
Kathleen’s expertise encompasses a myriad of issues, including injury prevention; housing law and policy; regulation of cannabis, alcohol, and tobacco; food security; maternal and child health; and oral health. She also brings expertise on the sources and scope of state and local public health powers to work in examining recent changes in laws impacting public health authority that have been proposed and passed in response to public health agency action during the pandemic. Her work and the work of the Network as a whole centers on health equity with a deep focus on law and policy that diminishes the detrimental impact of structural racism.
Kathleen was given the UMB President’s Award for Excellence in 2020 and in 2016 received the Jennifer Robbins Award for the Practice of Public Health Law by the American Public Health Association Law Section. Since 2020, Kathleen has served on the editorial board of the Centers for Disease and Control publication, Preventing Chronic Disease. She serves a variety of professional organizations and was appointed by Maryland’s Governor to the Maryland State Council on Cancer Control from 2018 to 2022.
After receiving her B.S. from Towson University, Kathleen graduated as a member of the Order of the Coif from the University of Maryland School of Law. She completed a clerkship with the Honorable Lawrence Rodowsky of the Maryland Court of Appeals and served with distinction as an Assistant Attorney General and Special Assistant to the Attorney General of Maryland prior to joining the University of Maryland Carey School of Law.
Overview November 19, 2026 | 12:00 – 1:30 p.m. CTJoin food safety experts for a webinar detailing recent changes to federal food safety policy; the…
The Supreme Court has long recognized that parents possess a fundamental interest in the care, custody, and upbringing of their children. At the same time, minors possess a constitutional right to privacy and bodily autonomy. This policy brief examines the changing legal landscape with respect to reproductive health care rights and parental rights at the federal level, and actions taken by states in the protection or restriction of reproductive health care rights through changes to statutes and state constitutions.
As climate-related disasters grow more frequent and costly, state and local governments are pursuing "Make Polluters Pay" strategies to hold major fossil fuel companies financially accountable for the public health costs of climate change. This new policy brief from the Network for Public Health Law explores the litigation and climate superfund laws driving these efforts, including a side-by-side comparison of the nation's first two climate superfund laws in Vermont and New York. It also examines the legal challenges and pushback these strategies face from industry, the federal government, and some states.
Overview Laws and policies that promote public health and health equity are designed to be effective for the broader population or specific demographics within the…
Overview The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) is a joint surveillance project between health departments and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)…
HDUs can provide health departments critical information to respond proactively to emergencies, public health risks, and equity focused use cases. They also address many contemporary concerns around data sharing, such as transparency around governance and ensuring the access and use of data serves the public good.
Overview February 19, 2026 | 11:00 a.m. – 12:30 p.m. CTPost-Dobbs, the United States has seen an onslaught of attacks on abortion care. Legal strategies…
This webinar will offer attendees an overview of changes in law and policy that impact access to reproductive health care directly or through indirect measures that deter pregnant people from seeking care. This webinar is an extension of a workshop held at the recent 2025 Public Health Law Conference and the bulk of the time will be devoted to attendees’ questions on the topics presented.
Local governments and community-based organizations seeking to improve public health through increasing access to nutritious food should consider the role of transportation policy. Demand Responsive Transit (DRT) is an alternative to public transportation that allows users to utilize smaller vans or buses without any fixed schedule or route. This resource includes case studies on DRT that could be applied in healthy food priority areas to increase access to healthy foods.
Law and policy play a critical role in shaping health outcomes especially when it comes to racial health equity. While legislative actions and trends matter, it is also important to understand the role of the courts in altering legal landscapes in ways that can positively or negatively impact racial health disparities. This fact sheet highlights four 2023 U.S. Supreme Court cases with examples of how each potentially impacts racial health equity. It also provides a further examination of two cases of the cases that can be classified as wins for racial health equity.
Pregnancy, giving birth, and being postpartum while incarcerated are linked to negative health impacts as people who are incarcerated are not provided adequate prenatal and postpartum care, and experience trauma from the experience. One policy that supports the health of pregnant people who are incarcerated is mandating access to safe and effective abortion care for those who do not want to be pregnant or give birth while incarcerated. This issue brief examines current state laws regarding access to abortion in carceral facilities in the states where abortion is generally available by law.
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), has indicated that he may lift the FDA’s ban on the interstate sale of raw milk and introduce voluntary raw milk standards for states to adopt. To prepare for these potential federal regulatory changes, states should be aware of their authority to regulate the intrastate sale of raw milk and consider implementing regulations that further minimize consumer risk. This Fact Sheet provides a background on raw milk and potential federal regulatory changes, along with strategies for states to prepare for this change.
